Final Mini-CAT Summer Semester

Mini-CAT Final                                                           Name: Markenzie Jean-baptiste

Clinical Question: Brief description of patient problem/setting (summarize the case very briefly)

 

A 56 y/o F is diagnosed with a severe case of community acquired pneumonia. The medical provider is interested in prescribing an adjunctive corticosteroid in addition to antibiotic therapy.

 

PICO Question: Clearly state the question (including outcomes or criteria to be tracked)

 

What is the efficacy of adjunctive corticosteroids in the treatment of severe community acquired pneumonia?

 

PICO search terms:

 

P I C O
Pneumonia Corticosteroids antibiotic mortality
Community acquired pneumonia prednisone placebo morbidity
  dexamethasone   Clinical cure
  hydrocortisone   Adverse effects
  Methylprednisolone   Treatment failure

 

 

 

Search tools and strategy used:

 

Please indicate what data bases/tools you used, provide a list of the terms you searched together in each tool, and how many articles were returned using those terms and filters.

 

Database Terms Filter Articles
PubMed Pneumonia

Corticosteroids

Placebo

Mortality

Meta-Analysis

Systematic Review

Randomized Control Trial

Last 10 Years

 

892
TRIP Database PICO Format:
P: Pneumonia

I: corticosteroids

C: placebo

O: mortality

Systematic Reviews: 34

Controlled Trials: 29

Primary Research: 14

1103
Cochrane Library (Wiley) Pneumonia

corticosteroids

antibiotic

N/A 20
JAMA Pneumonia

corticosteroids

antibiotic

Review

Research

329
ScienceDirect Pneumonia

corticosteroids

antibiotic

Last 10 Years

Review Articles

Open Access

8153

 

 Results found: 10,497

 

Explain how you narrow your choices to the few selected articles.

 

I was able to find a good amount of research relating to the use of adjunctive corticosteroids in the treatment of severe community acquired pneumonia. I used various data bases to find studies related to my clinical question but eventually focused on using PubMed and Trip Data Base. I yielded many studies initially but was able to narrow down the search with filters by study type and year. After applying the filters, I was able to select studies by reading the title, abstract and looking to see if the studies answered my specific question. When I narrowed down my studies, I chose the highest available level of evidence, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and/or Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).

 

 

 

 

 

Articles Chosen:

 

Article 1:

 

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec; 2017(12): CD007720.

Published online 2017 Dec 13. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007720.pub3

Corticosteroids for pneumonia

Anat Stern, Keren Skalsky, Tomer Avni, Elena Carrara, Leonard Leibovici, and Mical Paul

Article: Corticosteroids-for-pnuemonia.pdf

Type of article: Systematic Review
Abstract

Background

Pneumonia is a common and potentially serious illness. Corticosteroids have been suggested for the treatment of different types of infection, however their role in the treatment of pneumonia remains unclear. This is an update of a review published in 2011.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in the treatment of pneumonia.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group’s Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS on 3 March 2017, together with relevant conference proceedings and references of identified trials. We also searched three trials registers for ongoing and unpublished trials.

Selection criteria

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed systemic corticosteroid therapy, given as adjunct to antibiotic treatment, versus placebo or no corticosteroids for adults and children with pneumonia.

Data collection and analysis

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We estimated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled data using the Mantel–Haenszel fixed‐effect model when possible.

Main results

We included 17 RCTs comprising a total of 2264 participants; 13 RCTs included 1954 adult participants, and four RCTs included 310 children. This update included 12 new studies, excluded one previously included study, and excluded five new trials. One trial awaits classification.

All trials limited inclusion to inpatients with community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP), with or without healthcare‐associated pneumonia (HCAP). We assessed the risk of selection bias and attrition bias as low or unclear overall. We assessed performance bias risk as low for nine trials, unclear for one trial, and high for seven trials. We assessed reporting bias risk as low for three trials and high for the remaining 14 trials.

Corticosteroids significantly reduced mortality in adults with severe pneumonia (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.84; moderate‐quality evidence), but not in adults with non‐severe pneumonia (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.00). Early clinical failure rates (defined as death from any cause, radiographic progression, or clinical instability at day 5 to 8) were significantly reduced with corticosteroids in people with severe and non‐severe pneumonia (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.7; and RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.83, respectively; high‐quality evidence). Corstocosteroids reduced time to clinical cure, length of hospital and intensive care unit stays, development of respiratory failure or shock not present at pneumonia onset, and rates of pneumonia complications.

Among children with bacterial pneumonia, corticosteroids reduced early clinical failure rates (defined as for adults, RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.70; high‐quality evidence) based on two small, clinically heterogeneous trials, and reduced time to clinical cure.

Hyperglycaemia was significantly more common in adults treated with corticosteroids (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.14). There were no significant differences between corticosteroid‐treated people and controls for other adverse events or secondary infections (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.93).

Authors’ conclusions

Corticosteroid therapy reduced mortality and morbidity in adults with severe CAP; the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome was 18 patients (95% CI 12 to 49) to prevent one death. Corticosteroid therapy reduced morbidity, but not mortality, for adults and children with non‐severe CAP. Corticosteroid therapy was associated with more adverse events, especially hyperglycaemia, but the harms did not seem to outweigh the benefits.

Hyperlink: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6486210/

 

 

 

Article 2:

 

Respir Care. 2014 Apr;59(4):557-63. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02758. Epub 2013 Sep 17. Corticosteroid Therapy for Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis

Ming Cheng  1 Zhi-Yong PanJiong YangYa-Dong Gao

Article: CorticosteroidtherapyforsevereCAP.Meta-analysis.pdf

Type of article: Meta-Analysis
Abstract

Background: The debate about the efficacy of corticosteroids in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is still a longstanding dilemma. We performed a meta-analysis including 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of corticosteroids on the treatment of severe CAP in adults.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of published and unpublished clinical trials. Databases, including PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane (from their establishment to July 2013), were searched for relevant articles. Only RCTs of corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy in adult patients with severe CAP were selected.

Results: Four trials enrolling 264 patients with severe CAP were included. Use of corticosteroids significantly reduced hospital mortality compared with conventional therapy and placebo (Peto odds ratio = 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.90). The quality of the evidence underlying the pooled estimate of effect on hospital mortality was low, downgraded for inconsistency and imprecision.

Conclusions: On the basis of the current limited evidence, we suggest that, although corticosteroid therapy may reduce mortality and improve the prognosis of adult patients with severe CAP, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the instability of pooled estimates. Reliable treatment recommendations will be raised only when large sufficiently powered multi-center RCTs are conducted.

Hyperlink: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24046464/?from_term=corticosteroid+community+acquired+pneumonia&from_filter=simsearch2.ffrft&from_filter=pubt.meta-analysis&from_filter=pubt.randomizedcontrolledtrial&from_filter=pubt.systematicreviews&from_filter=ds1.y_10&from_pos=4

 

 

 

Article 3:

 

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun; 98(26): e16239.

Published online 2019 Jun 28. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016239

Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia. A meta-analysis

Shan Jiang, MD,a Tiecheng Liu, PhD,b Yuxin Hu, PhD,a Ranwei Li, PhD,c Xin Di, PhD,d Xin Jin, PhD,d Yanqiao Wang, MD,a and Ke Wang, PhDa,

Article: Efficacyandsafetyofglucocorticoid.pdf

Type of article: Meta-analysis
Abstract

Background:

Recent clinical trials have shown that adjunctive glucocorticoids is associated with inhibiting excessive inflammatory response and modulating cytokines release offering several advantages over conventional therapy on relieving clinical symptoms, reducing mortality, and improving prognosis. However, given the severe complications triggered by glucocorticosteroid, whether similar benefits may be achieved by patients undergoing glucocorticosteroid intervention remains controversial. Our meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive glucocorticoids in the treatment of severe community acquired pneumonia.

Methods:

A search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, EBASO, Medline, Google Scholar, Science Dicet, CBM, and CNKI databases was performed to analyze all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of corticosteroids in patients with severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) up to January 2018. All-cause mortality, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, incidence of septic shock, and requirement of mechanical ventilation were selected as efficacy outcomes. Major adverse events involving super infection, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and hyperglycemia were safety outcomes. Meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 software.

Results:

A total of 10 RCTs comprising 665 patients were included for analysis. Regarding efficacy outcomes, adjunctive corticosteroid seemed to be superior compared with conventional treatment in terms of all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3–0.74, P = .001), CRP level on day 8 after administration (standard mean difference [SMD]: −0.8, 95% CI, −1.11 to −0.5, P < .001), incidence of septic shock (odds ratio [OR] 0.15, 95% CI, 0.07–0.29, P < .001) and requirement for mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.32, 95% CI, 0.20–0.52, P < .001). Meanwhile, we found that low dose (≤86 mg) (RR: 0.41, 95% CI, 0.21–0.82, P = .01) and prolonged (>5 days) (RR: 0.35, 95% CI, 0.15–0.81, P = .01) use of corticosteroids in dosage modus of a maintenance dose after a bolus (RR: 0.28, 95% CI, 0.14–0.55, P = .002) obtained better results in death through subgroup analysis. Regarding safety outcomes, no difference was observed between 2 groups in terms of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (OR: 0.83, 95% CI, 0.27–2.52, P = .74), hyperglycemia (OR: 1.3, 95% CI, 0.68–2.49, P = .42), and super infection (OR: 1.11, 95% CI, 0.14–9.13, P = .92).

Conclusion:

Adjunctive corticosteroid yielded favorable outcomes in the treatment of severe community acquired pneumonia (SCAP) as evidenced by decreased all-cause mortality, incidence of septic shock, and requirement for mechanical ventilation without increasing risk of adverse events. Low dose (≤86 mg/d), prolonged use (>5 days) of corticosteroid in dosage modus of a maintenance dose after a bolus can be recommended as preferred regimen to guard against SCAP.

 

Hyperlink: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31261585/?from_term=corticosteroid+community+acquired+pneumonia&from_filter=simsearch2.ffrft&from_filter=pubt.meta-analysis&from_filter=pubt.randomizedcontrolledtrial&from_filter=pubt.systematicreviews&from_filter=ds1.y_10&from_pos=5

 

Article 4:

 

JAMA . 2015 Feb 17;313(7):677-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.88.

Effect of Corticosteroids on Treatment Failure Among Hospitalized Patients With Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia and High Inflammatory Response: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Antoni Torres  1 Oriol Sibila  2 Miquel Ferrer  3 Eva Polverino  3 Rosario Menendez  4 Josep Mensa  5 Albert Gabarrús  3 Jacobo Sellarés  3 Marcos I Restrepo  6 Antonio Anzueto  7 Michael S Niederman  8 Carles Agustí 

Article: joi150004.pdf

Type of article: Randomized Control Trial
Abstract

Importance: In patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia, treatment failure is associated with excessive inflammatory response and worse outcomes. Corticosteroids may modulate cytokine release in these patients, but the benefit of this adjunctive therapy remains controversial.

Objective: To assess the effect of corticosteroids in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high associated inflammatory response.

Design, setting, and participants: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 3 Spanish teaching hospitals involving patients with both severe community-acquired pneumonia and a high inflammatory response, which was defined as a level of C-reactive protein greater than 150 mg/L at admission. Patients were recruited and followed up from June 2004 through February 2012.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either an intravenous bolus of 0.5 mg/kg per 12 hours of methylprednisolone (n = 61) or placebo (n = 59) for 5 days started within 36 hours of hospital admission.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was treatment failure (composite outcome of early treatment failure defined as [1] clinical deterioration indicated by development of shock, [2] need for invasive mechanical ventilation not present at baseline, or [3] death within 72 hours of treatment; or composite outcome of late treatment failure defined as [1] radiographic progression, [2] persistence of severe respiratory failure, [3] development of shock, [4] need for invasive mechanical ventilation not present at baseline, or [5] death between 72 hours and 120 hours after treatment initiation; or both early and late treatment failure). In-hospital mortality was a secondary outcome and adverse events were assessed.

Results: There was less treatment failure among patients from the methylprednisolone group (8 patients [13%]) compared with the placebo group (18 patients [31%]) (P = .02), with a difference between groups of 18% (95% CI, 3% to 32%). Corticosteroid treatment reduced the risk of treatment failure (odds ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.87]; P = .02). In-hospital mortality did not differ between the 2 groups (6 patients [10%] in the methylprednisolone group vs 9 patients [15%] in the placebo group; P = .37); the difference between groups was 5% (95% CI, -6% to 17%). Hyperglycemia occurred in 11 patients (18%) in the methylprednisolone group and in 7 patients (12%) in the placebo group (P = .34).

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high initial inflammatory response, the acute use of methylprednisolone compared with placebo decreased treatment failure. If replicated, these findings would support the use of corticosteroids as adjunctive treatment in this clinical population.

Hyperlink: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2110967

 

 

 

 

 

Summary of the Evidence:

 

Author (Date) Level of Evidence Sample/Setting

(# of subjects/ studies, cohort definition etc. )

Outcome(s) studied Key Findings Limitations and Biases
Anat Stern, Keren Skalsky, Tomer Avni, Elena Carrara, Leonard Leibovici, and Mical Paul(Dec 2017)

 

Systematic Review – Authors searched Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group’s Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS on 3 March 2017, together with relevant conference proceedings and references of identified trials. They also searched three trials registered for ongoing and unpublished trials.

 

Inclusion Criteria:

Included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing corticosteroid to placebo or no treatment. All included trials limited inclusion to participants with CAP, with or without HCAP, who were treated as inpatients.

 

 

-17 randomized control trials with n=2264 participants were included.

 

 (1) all‐cause mortality within 30 days after randomization.

(2) Early clinical failure

3) Time to clinical failure

4) Development of respiratory failure

5) development of shock

6) Transfer to ICU

7) Duration of Hospital/ICU Stay

8)Complications or secondary infections.

Corticosteroids significantly reduced mortality in adults with severe pneumonia (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.84; moderate‐quality evidence), but not in adults with non‐severe pneumonia (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.00). Early clinical failure rates (defined as death from any cause, radiographic progression, or clinical instability at day 5 to 8) were significantly reduced with corticosteroids in people with severe and non‐severe pneumonia (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.7; and RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.83, respectively; high‐quality evidence). Corticosteroids reduced time to clinical cure, length of hospital and intensive care unit stays, development of respiratory failure or shock not present at pneumonia onset, and rates of pneumonia complications.

 

 

– Authors recognize: Only two trials provided mortality data per study arm in the subgroups of severe and non‐severe pneumonia

Also, mortality, although reflecting the severity of pneumonia, may be influenced by other parameters such as the antibiotic regimens used or the standard of medical care given in the specific centre.

 

 

Ming Cheng Zhi-Yong PanJiong YangYa-Dong Gao ( Sep 2013) Meta-analysis of randomized trials – Authors searched

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane (from their establishment to July 2013),

– Four trials enrolling 264 patients with severe CAP were included.

Inclusion Criteria:

(1) only studies designed as RCTs,(2) adult patients with severe CAP as participants, (3)intervention with corticosteroids used as adjunctive therapy for patients with severe CAP, (4) control intervention with placebo (normal saline solution or drugs with a physical appearance similar to corticosteroids), and (5) hospital mortality as the primary outcome

 

 

-Primary outcomes include Hospital mortality or, when that information was un-available, mortality at the longest follow-up time..

 

– Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, duration of MV, days off MV, and adverse effects

 

 

 

 Our meta-analysis showed that use of corticosteroids significantly reduced hospital mortality compared with conventional therapy and placebo (Peto odds ratio0.39,95% CI 0.17–0.90).

 

(1) First, the sensitivity analysis revealed the instability of pooled esti-mates due to the limited number of studies included, which reflected substantial heterogeneity among those studies

 

(2 Second, this study lacked the power to test publication bias because of the limited number of trials included. In the study by Confalonieri et al, 7 patients died in the control group, but none died in the intervention group, which may generate high publication bias. (3)Importantly, the small sample size, a common problem in 4 studies, may have biased their results.

(4)Moreover this meta-analysis lacked pooled effect to detect potentially significant harmful effects because of a relatively small number of included trials. (5) Finally, various types of dosages, and durations of corticosteroids were used in the 4 trials. In addition, the diagnosis criteria of severe pneumonia were not exactly the same in these trials

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

Shan Jiang, MD,a Tiecheng Liu, PhD,b Yuxin Hu, PhD,a Ranwei Li, PhD,c Xin Di, PhD,d Xin Jin, PhD,d Yanqiao Wang, MD,a and Ke Wang, PhD (Jun 2019) Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials – Authors searched electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, EBASO, Medline, Google Scholar, Science Dicet, CBM, and CNKI to analyze all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of corticosteroids in patients with severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) up to January 2018.

 

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical randomized controlled trials published at home and abroad in English and Chinese which compared antimicrobial therapy and adjunctive systematic glucocorticoids therapy with antimicrobial therapy alone in patients with severe community acquired pneumonia.

 

– A total of 10 RCTs comprising 665 patients were included for analysis.

 

All-cause mortality, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, incidence of septic shock, and requirement of mechanical ventilation were selected as efficacy outcomes.

 

– The results of the study showed that adjunctive corticosteroid seemed to be superior compared with conventional treatment in terms of all-cause mortality, CRP level on day 8 after administration, incidence of septic shock and requirement for mechanical ventilation. In terms of safety, no difference was observed between 2 groups in terms of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, hyperglycemia and super infection. – (1 First, the potential role of adrenal function as an important marker for assessing the effect of corticosteroid has not been directly appraised restrained by insufficient data. (2) Second, as there is no general agreement on standard definition of scoring system in severe CAP, the clinical heterogeneity inherent among the included studies could not be resolved. In addition, the severity, along with complexity and laboratory examination of the enrolled patients, is difficult to reach a unified standard.

(3)Third, it is underpowered to assess the risk of death as demonstrated by analysis because of a lack of long-term follow-up data.

(4) Fourth, the sample size of the included literatures and studies is small, which has a significant impact on the reliability of the results.

 

Antoni Torres, MD, PhD; Oriol Sibila, MD, PhD; Miquel Ferrer, MD, PhD; et al (Feb 2015)

 

Randomized Controlled Trials – Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 3 Spanish teaching hospitals involving patients with both severe community-acquired pneumonia and a high inflammatory response, which was defined as a level of C-reactive protein greater than 150 mg/L at admission. Patients were recruited and followed up from June 2004 through February 2012.

Interventions  Patients were randomized to receive either an intravenous bolus of 0.5 mg/kg per 12 hours of methylprednisolone (n = 61) or placebo (n = 59) for 5 days started within 36 hours of hospital admission.

 

The primary outcome was treatment failure (composite outcome of early treatment failure defined as [1] clinical deterioration indicated by development of shock, [2] need for invasive mechanical ventilation not present at baseline, or [3] death within 72 hours of treatment; or composite outcome of late treatment failure defined as [1] radiographic progression, [2] persistence of severe respiratory failure, [3] development of shock, [4] need for invasive mechanical ventilation not present at baseline, or [5] death between 72 hours and 120 hours after treatment initiation; or both early and late treatment failure). In-hospital mortality was a secondary outcome and adverse events were assessed.

 

– The results of the study showed that there was less treatment failure among patients from the methylprednisolone group (8 patients [13%]) compared with the placebo group (18 patients [31%]) (P = .02), with a difference between groups of 18% (95% CI, 3% to 32%). Corticosteroid treatment reduced the risk of treatment failure (odds ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.87]; P = .02). In-hospital mortality did not differ between the 2 groups (6 patients [10%] in the methylprednisolone group vs 9 patients [15%] in the placebo group; P = .37); the difference between groups was 5% (95% CI, −6% to 17%). Hyperglycemia occurred in 11 patients (18%) in the methylprednisolone group and in 7 patients (12%) in the placebo group (P = .34).

 

– (1 First, the potential role of adrenal function as an important marker for assessing the effect of corticosteroid has not been directly appraised restrained by insufficient data. (2) Second, as there is no general agreement on standard definition of scoring system in severe CAP, the clinical heterogeneity inherent among the included studies could not be resolved. In addition, the severity, along with complexity and laboratory examination of the enrolled patients, is difficult to reach a unified standard.

(3)Third, it is underpowered to assess the risk of death as demonstrated by analysis because of a lack of long-term follow-up data.

(4) Fourth, the sample size of the included literatures and studies is small, which has a significant impact on the reliability of the results.

 

 

 

 

Conclusion(s):

 

Anat Stern et al concluded that corticosteroids significantly reduced mortality in adults with severe pneumonia but not in adults with non-severe pneumonia. Corticosteroid therapy was associated with more adverse events, especially hyperglycemia, but the harms did not seem to outweigh the benefits. The early clinical failure rates were significantly reduced with corticosteroids in people with severe and non-severe pneumonia. Corticosteroids also reduced time to clinical cure, length of hospital and intensive care unit stays, development of respiratory failure or shock not present at pneumonia onset, and rates of pneumonia complications.

 

Ming Cheng et al concluded that the use of corticosteroids reduced hospital mortality compared with conventional therapy and placebo.

 

Shan Jiang et al concluded that adjunctive corticosteroid seemed to be superior compared with conventional treatment in terms of all-cause mortality, CRP level on day 8 after administration, incidence of septic shock and requirement for mechanical ventilation. In terms of safety, no difference was observed between 2 groups in terms of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, hyperglycemia and super infection.

 

Antoni Torres et al concluded that among patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high initial inflammatory response, the acute use of methylprednisolone compared with placebo decreased treatment failure

 

My overall conclusion based on these four systematic review/meta-analysis and randomized control studies is that adjunctive corticosteroids has favorable outcomes in treatment of severe community acquired pneumonia including decreasing treatment failure rates, reducing time to clinical cure, and reducing mortality.

 

Clinical Bottom Line:

I will weigh my studies in the following order: Anat Stern et al, Shan Jiang et al, Ming Cheng et al, Antoni Torres et al

I weighed Anat Stern et al, as the highest because it was a systematic review published in 2017. It included a large number of trials and participants with 17 randomized control trials with n=2264 participants. This helps with reliability of the results. I also liked the outcomes measured as the results showed that corticosteroids reduced time to clinical cure, length of hospital and intensive care unit stays, development of respiratory failure or shock not present at pneumonia onset, and rates of pneumonia complications. These all help to fully measure the efficacy of corticosteroids. A limitation to this study is that only two trials provided mortality data, although the severity of pneumonia could be influenced by other parameters such as the antibiotic regimens used, or the standard of medical care given in the specific center.

I weighed Shan Jiang et al as the second highest study. It was published in 2019 which is the most recent out of all of the studies I selected. It included the second highest amount of studies with 10 RCT’s. It included 665 patients which is small and a limitation to this study. I like that the study compared antimicrobial therapy and adjunctive systematic glucocorticoid therapy against antimicrobial therapy alone in patients with severe community acquired pneumonia

I weighed Ming Cheng et al as the third highest study because it included 4 studies and 264 patients. The results did show that use of corticosteroids reduced hospital mortality compared with conventional therapy and placebo. However, the low number of studies and patients was a limitation that effected the pooled estimates of all the results, including power to test publication bias, and ability to detect potentially significant harmful effects of corticosteroids.

I weighed Antoni Torres et al as the 4th highest study because it was a randomized control trial with only 112 participants that completed the study out of 120 patients randomized. The sample size was small so that was a limitation of the study. I liked that it measured treatment failure of methylprednisolone and included various meanings for early treatment failure including clinical deterioration indicated by development of shock, need for invasive mechanical ventilation and death within 72 hours of treatment. It also included late treatment failure defined as radiographic progression, persistence of severe respiratory failure, development of shock, need for invasive mechanical ventilation not present at baseline and death between 72 hours and 120 hours after treatment initiation.

 

Magnitude of any effects

 

  1. Anat Stern, Keren Skalsky, Tomer Avni, Elena Carrara, Leonard Leibovici, and Mical Paul(Dec 2017)

 

Corticosteroids significantly reduced mortality in adults with severe pneumonia (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.84; moderate‐quality evidence. Early clinical failure rates were significantly reduced with corticosteroids in people with severe and non‐severe pneumonia (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.7; and RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.83, respectively; high‐quality evidence).

 

  1. Shan Jiang, MD,a Tiecheng Liu, PhD,b Yuxin Hu, PhD,a Ranwei Li, PhD,c Xin Di, PhD,d Xin Jin, PhD,d Yanqiao Wang, MD,a and Ke Wang, PhD (Jun 2019)

 

Regarding efficacy outcomes, adjunctive corticosteroid seemed to be superior compared with conventional treatment in terms of all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-0.74, P = .001), CRP level on day 8 after administration (standard mean difference [SMD]: -0.8, 95% CI, -1.11 to -0.5, P < .001), incidence of septic shock (odds ratio [OR] 0.15, 95% CI, 0.07-0.29, P < .001) and requirement for mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.32, 95% CI, 0.20-0.52, P < .001).

 

  1. Ming Cheng Zhi-Yong PanJiong YangYa-Dong Gao ( Sep 2013) 

 

Use of corticosteroids significantly reduced hospital mortality compared with conventional therapy and placebo (Peto odds ratio = 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.90).

 

  1. Antoni Torres, MD, PhD; Oriol Sibila, MD, PhD; Miquel Ferrer, MD, PhD; et al (Feb 2015)

 

Corticosteroid treatment reduced the risk of treatment failure (odds ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.87]; P = .02).

 

 

 Clinical Significance:

For this Mini-CAT, I wanted to understand the efficacy of corticosteroids in the treatment of severe community acquired pneumonia. After reviewing all 4 studies, the clinical bottom line is that adjunctive corticosteroids in treatment of severe community acquired pneumonia shows favorable outcomes in reducing mortality, time to clinical cure, length of hospital and intensive care unit stays, and treatment failure rates.  Due to the potential for adverse effects, corticosteroids should not be routinely used. They should be used for patients who have evidence of septic shock refractory to fluid resuscitation and vasopressor administration or patients with respiratory failure and metabolic acidosis. These patients are at high risk of mortality. Also, it is important to note that corticosteroid therapy has associated adverse events like hyperglycemia and should be used with caution in diabetics in treating severe community acquired pneumonia.

 

Other Considerations:

Future research should aim to create a larger scale study that includes more participants, so the results are more reliable. Also, future studies can assess which corticosteroid and dose is most effective, as well as which corticosteroid has the least side effects.

 

 

Citations:

 

1)  Stern, A., Skalsky, K., Avni, T., Carrara, E., Leibovici, L., & Paul, M. (2017). Corticosteroids for pneumonia. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd007720.pub3

 

2) Cheng, M., Pan, Z., Yang, J., & Gao, Y. (2013). Corticosteroid Therapy for Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis. Respiratory Care, 59(4), 557-563. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02758

 

3) Jiang, S., Liu, T., Hu, Y., Li, R., Di, X., & Jin, X. et al. (2019). Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Medicine, 98(26), e16239. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000016239

 

4) Torres, A., Sibila, O., Ferrer, M., Polverino, E., Menendez, R., & Mensa, J. et al. (2015). Effect of Corticosteroids on Treatment Failure Among Hospitalized Patients With Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia and High Inflammatory Response. JAMA, 313(7), 677. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.88

 

5)https://www-uptodate-com.york.ezproxy.cuny.edu/contents/treatment-of-community-acquired-pneumonia-in-adults-who-require-hospitalization?search=corticosteroids%20pneumonia&sectionRank=1&usage_type=default&anchor=H3950330468&source=machineLearning&selectedTitle=1~150&display_rank=1#H3950330468